Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Change how paralyze works
#25

Eighty Swords Wrote:It's bad to be a porn star?? :eek:

Lets just say it flopped.. just to say it mildly! So not exactly a star!

IN1: Andrew / Andrew the Almighty (forums)
IN-X: Andrew, High Ranger [Rangers of the North]
[Image: siggie.jpg]
#26

Stallone is huge (and I'm not talking about down there)! Couldn't have turned out too bad for him lol.
#27

Eighty Swords Wrote:Stallone is huge (and I'm not talking about down there)! Couldn't have turned out too bad for him lol.

back then he wasent!

[Image: stallowned.jpg]

IN1: Andrew / Andrew the Almighty (forums)
IN-X: Andrew, High Ranger [Rangers of the North]
[Image: siggie.jpg]
#28

Well if your truly paralyzed. Then you shouldn't be able to cast spells at all ;p
#29

Yankovic Wrote:Well if your truly paralyzed. Then you shouldn't be able to cast spells at all ;p

Hence why I said there should be no reason NOT to change it Big Grin
#30

why don't we allow casting spells when bandging then?

this is actually retarded ur paralyzed, macros exists so use them. If your to damn lazy or stupid enough to not have one then u deserve to wait x amount of time for being that dumb. next time i die i'll cry about not having a heal macro set


i'd also like to point out that casting a spell is different than OPENING stuff (ie backpack or spellbook), we can cast with macros cuz u don't need to open anything.
#31

Yes Luda, we understand you're opinion that UO is all about macros. But I assure you when this game was first made, it wasn't made with the intention of making people use third party programs.

Why are you making such a big deal out of it though? It doesn't even introduce any NEGATIVE components to INX. It just helps people that 1 time they're in a jam. Why are you soooo against it?

And what Yankovic was getting at was that when you cast a spell your character does hand motions, but he can't if paralyzed, because as you put it 'when you're paralyzed that means you can't move, and that includes your arms' so I guess we will have to stop people from casting spells all together when paralyzed... whether through a macro or not.
#32

LudaKrishna Wrote:i'd also like to point out that casting a spell is different than OPENING stuff (ie backpack or spellbook), we can cast with macros cuz u don't need to open anything.

Still, you need to move to cast. Magery isn't a form of telekinesis, you grab the regs and make motions with your hands while speaking the words of power. Back in the day we had pouches to unparalyze us because flicking open a trapped pouch was something someone could do much more easily then cast a spell. I mean that in the sense that you could find a paralyzing spell enough to flick open a little pouch in comparison to grabbing regs and moving your arms.

Personally I always liked trapped pouches as it was slightly more realistic for such a scenario. After all... how paralyzed can you be if you can still cast normally. Of course way back then we also had pre-casting to counter para easier as well. We should just rename paralyze to something like, 'magic cement' since it only focuses on keeping someone from moving, not casting as it was intended back in the day.
#33

Quote:Why are you making such a big deal out of it though? It doesn't even introduce any NEGATIVE components to INX. It just helps people that 1 time they're in a jam. Why are you soooo against it?

Yes it does the mindset of people always having a way out, of anything, when infact your supposed to have a damn macro, people have to learn how to do stuff. It's like when people join a CTF and don't know how to return the flag, you tell them how and then it's up to them to do it. People have to LEARN around here, something people don't like doing i gotta say.


Why are 90% your suggestions or bugs either not useful and not even bugs? Seriously I'm not even the only one who thinks your suggestions are irrelevent (besides tech). Hell because of your renaming s hit my regs/scrolls don't even stack anymore which is more of a problem than a naming scheme.


This is to everyone: People should be doing things to get the PLAYERBASE UP AND STOP BITC HING about damn useless shit that doesn't even affect the playerbase.
#34

LudaKrishna Wrote:Yes it does the mindset of people always having a way out, of anything, when infact your supposed to have a damn macro, people have to learn how to do stuff. It's like when people join a CTF and don't know how to return the flag, you tell them how and then it's up to them to do it. People have to LEARN around here, something people don't like doing i gotta say.

People dont HAVE to have macros... macros are there to HELP you. They're not an obligation.


LudaKrishna Wrote:Why are 90% your suggestions or bugs either not useful and not even bugs? Seriously I'm not even the only one who thinks your suggestions are irrelevent (besides tech). Hell because of your renaming s hit my regs/scrolls don't even stack anymore which is more of a problem than a naming scheme.

Usefulness is a matter of opinion, and in my opinion the things I bring up do have a use and would be cool to have and there's a reason I report something as a bug. I don't do it to waste people's time, I do it because I think it's a bug.

As for regs/scrolls not stacking PM Taran. I told him what happened when the scroll names and reg names got changed around and he told me changing something in the code doesn't affect existing items so he will have to do a global mod. If you PM him about it and he sees I'm not the only one bugged by this I'm sure he'd consider it more important to get done (or incase he forgot about this) and would in turn do it asap.


LudaKrishna Wrote:This is to everyone: People should be doing things to get the PLAYERBASE UP AND STOP BITC HING about damn useless shit that doesn't even affect the playerbase.

Oh yes, you're really doing a great job of that by discouraging every suggestion everyone makes and not giving any of your own...
#35

i gave mine, put webstatus (old way) to promote pvp, send out emails so old players know about the shard get better hardware that will support 100 players. If we're not gunna get new hardware then ppl should just say it because if the current server can't hold more than 80 ppl wuts the point in having a shard with just 20-30 ppl max?

yes in this game macros are obligatory, u think anyone will gm the skills manually without a macro, so yes they HAVE to have macros. If you don't have any you will find it extremly hard to play the game in almost every aspect.

and finally i put down this suggestion because it is retarded, and matter of opinions ask people and they'll tell u half ur "bugs" and suggetions are useless
#36

i like how this thread is being non referenced as a UO:Real life thread, but when i posted about my black mustang back in the day you guys used that card on me

Ohh well if your in real life and your from a distance you can see inside the house and shoot rocks or kill animals!

well **** that i want my black mustang back, it must be because im technique that the server doesn't correspond my way ever

this should be looked at the same way if your paralized in real life you cant move your arms therefore you can't open your spell book so leave it be


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 21 Guest(s)