Posts: 372
Threads: 63
Joined: Jun 2011
I just reinstalled UO but when I attempt to open it to patch itself an error message pops up saying
Quote:C:\Program Files\EA Games\Ultima Online 2D Client\UO.exe is not a valid Win32 application.
Does anyone know what could be causing this and how I can fix it?
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2011, 04:05 AM by
Lamby.)
Posts: 2,059
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2011
How did you install? With UOML setup or with the INSetup.exe?
If it's with INSetup, I made that package on a 64-bit Windows system which may cause problems. I dind't think of that when I set it up.
Posts: 372
Threads: 63
Joined: Jun 2011
omg. I reinstalled using the manual method and I can logon but the world is all messed up. I fell asleep while it was patching and it went past 6.0.14 up to 7.0.4... could that be the problem?
Posts: 70
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2011
I would guess yes, reinstall that mofo....
Posts: 372
Threads: 63
Joined: Jun 2011
Reinstalled it to 6.0.14.4 with the following result:
![[Image: Lamby_9-7_10.29.jpg]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-kDLAZvV8Nbo/TmeAIAl33tI/AAAAAAAAAB0/MgqceBsgFts/s640/Lamby_9-7_10.29.jpg)
It looks like i need to run IN patcher but when i do it says fully patched.
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2011, 04:39 PM by
Lamby.)
Posts: 70
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2011
Make sure you are picking the client 6x option in the patcher.....
Posts: 372
Threads: 63
Joined: Jun 2011
Ok I picked the client 6x option... it downloaded to client patched, but no noticeable change.
Posts: 35
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2011
My installation is better than that, tho i do have problems with some stuff.
can manage the problems i have atm but i prob have to try install a few times to get it right.
Posts: 372
Threads: 63
Joined: Jun 2011
I reinstalled using the manual install directions half a dozen times and the result has been the same each time. :mad:
Posts: 35
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2011
have you tryed in the IN patcher to select force update and under it all files and go
?
Posts: 372
Threads: 63
Joined: Jun 2011
Alexstrasza... God bless your heart, your advice worked. Thank you.
Posts: 2,059
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2011
The problem was probably how the patcher works and how it detects when the files have changed.
This actually gave me an interesting idea. I can probably get the patcher to compare MD5 hashes on the files so that it will detect whether it's different, not just the last time it patched. Why didn't I think of this before...
