03-31-2009, 11:14 AM
Na I dont feel ignored at all odium, and I know changing anything around requires factoring in a lot of variables, also in many cases the scripting of changes can be very difficult and time consuming. Which I think more often then not is the reason for some things being put off.
But like you said things can always be improved, and with the mount system its easy to see where there are fundamental problems with it. No solution will benefit everyone, so the best that can be hoped for is to find a solution which is at least detrimental to no one.
Awesome idea! Vet is such a pain to gain. Would be great for it to actually be useful. Its this kind of solution we need more of around here
Shade came up with some really innovative ideas as well for ways to fix up some problems with mount spawns without really having to change much of anything.
But like you said things can always be improved, and with the mount system its easy to see where there are fundamental problems with it. No solution will benefit everyone, so the best that can be hoped for is to find a solution which is at least detrimental to no one.
Odium Wrote:[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]
Bonding in my eyes are not a good solution.
Instead of bonding we could have it so players with GM animal lore and GM vetrenarians are able to ressurect their own dead mounts with bandages, but not other players mounts (would work like bonding but put another aspec to it. Players could still kill their mounts and "guard" the corpse untill it decay but you would have easier to retrieve it if you die in for example a dungeon to monsters.
[/COLOR]
Awesome idea! Vet is such a pain to gain. Would be great for it to actually be useful. Its this kind of solution we need more of around here
Shade came up with some really innovative ideas as well for ways to fix up some problems with mount spawns without really having to change much of anything.