11-29-2007, 06:59 PM
Pinging 64.34.160.92 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.34.160.92: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=48
Reply from 64.34.160.92: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=48
Reply from 64.34.160.92: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=48
Reply from 64.34.160.92: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=48
Ping statistics for 64.34.160.92:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 84ms, Maximum = 90ms, Average = 86ms
Better for me.
Pinging games05.xs4all.nl [194.109.69.205] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=113
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=113
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=113
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=113
Ping statistics for 194.109.69.205:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 148ms, Maximum = 151ms, Average = 149ms
Not so good, but not as bad as usuall.
From Central Texas.
Reply from 64.34.160.92: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=48
Reply from 64.34.160.92: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=48
Reply from 64.34.160.92: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=48
Reply from 64.34.160.92: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=48
Ping statistics for 64.34.160.92:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 84ms, Maximum = 90ms, Average = 86ms
Better for me.
Pinging games05.xs4all.nl [194.109.69.205] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=113
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=113
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=113
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=113
Ping statistics for 194.109.69.205:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 148ms, Maximum = 151ms, Average = 149ms
Not so good, but not as bad as usuall.
From Central Texas.