10-31-2007, 12:15 PM
Magery at best would be the key to making it a bit more "fair and balanced." God, I hate Fox News for that term.
Magery, by being easier, gives newbie characters a chance to make money, buy shit from GM crafters. Otherwise, they'll just stock up, which I assume will be the outcome anyway, and that's really not an economy.
There are two sides to this, both with good points, but it would be nice to be able to go buy a shit load of bandages and just macro until the cows come home.
I still advocate that all crafts not be transfered. Then it really wouldn't be "Carebear" as many keep saying and everyone is on the same foot, save combats.
Usually the first one to GM smithy gets to dominate until someone else comes along and competes, thus, en economy. I'm already looking at people with exceedingly accurate vanqs, and they're decent weapons too. Along with rare tubs, etc...so, transferring the tubs is also fair? Eh.
**** it. I'm tired of chatting to deaf, stubborn ears. It's easy to judge when you have it all already.
Magery, by being easier, gives newbie characters a chance to make money, buy shit from GM crafters. Otherwise, they'll just stock up, which I assume will be the outcome anyway, and that's really not an economy.
There are two sides to this, both with good points, but it would be nice to be able to go buy a shit load of bandages and just macro until the cows come home.
I still advocate that all crafts not be transfered. Then it really wouldn't be "Carebear" as many keep saying and everyone is on the same foot, save combats.
Usually the first one to GM smithy gets to dominate until someone else comes along and competes, thus, en economy. I'm already looking at people with exceedingly accurate vanqs, and they're decent weapons too. Along with rare tubs, etc...so, transferring the tubs is also fair? Eh.
**** it. I'm tired of chatting to deaf, stubborn ears. It's easy to judge when you have it all already.