[Eighty Swords]

luda hes just trying to suck up lol, i remember when he sold his bard to a gms character mortal instead of me when i was paying more then what he offered and he sold it cheaper

reality check eighty, selling a max bard for cheaper won't get you staff neither will saying you don't lag when you really do because even shade papa me monkey and luda people from all over the world in different areas all have the same problem

Would you shut the **** up? Holy crap man whatever I do you have an issue with.

As it is I got over 400k for it so it wasn't a horrible deal. Ever think I sold it to him because he's not an *******?

And as I said before I spoke with Taran about being staff and he told me no. End of story. So STFU with that crap.

[smoke]

Would you shut the **** up? Holy crap man whatever I do you have an issue with.

As it is I got over 400k for it so it wasn't a horrible deal. Ever think I sold it to him because he's not an *******?

And as I said before I spoke with Taran about being staff and he told me no. End of story. So STFU with that crap.

LOL theres actually no reason then why you sold it for cheaper even if hes nicer because your would of made a profit you're just retarded then hahahahah

even sandra offered more then him you're just a ridiculous suck up

[imported_LudaKrishna]

yank this is more lag than the norm and it's hard to believe everyone's ISPs are causing this...

[Eighty Swords]

LOL theres actually no reason then why you sold it for cheaper even if hes nicer because your would of made a profit you're just retarded then hahahahah

even sandra offered more then him you're just a ridiculous suck up

Actually, no sandra didn't offer more. I posted in the thread saying I got an offer for over 400k from someone who doesn't want to be named and you all called me a liar and said I just wanted to jack the price. You all lost out for not believing me, not me.

[imported_Yankovic]

I have been running a tracert from the server to Papa Smurf. And I've ran a tracert from my home.

From the server I have 200 - 300ms and the packets go through los angeles. From my home it is around 100ms and doesn't go through los angeles.

However, all this happens in america and not the netherlands. In america some computer decides where to send the packets to. So there is no way that xs4all can help you in any way with this problem. So if you luda are also living in america you probably have the same issue. If you don't live there then there is some other issue.

If the server (hardware) itself is really acting weird, other than the supposed lag there is now, then everyone would notice it including myself.

[smoke]

Actually, no sandra didn't offer more. I posted in the thread saying I got an offer for over 400k from someone who doesn't want to be named and you all called me a liar and said I just wanted to jack the price. You all lost out for not believing me, not me.

lol sandra offered 450-500k she even made a thread go look for it in the trade section maybe she just offered lower because he doesn't like you?

[imported_LudaKrishna]

yank i live in canada

Code:

Pinging games05.xs4all.nl [194.109.69.205] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=109
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=109
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=109
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=109

Ping statistics for 194.109.69.205:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 131ms, Maximum = 133ms, Average = 132ms

Here's the tracert

Code:

Tracing route to games05.xs4all.nl [194.109.69.205]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.2.1
  2     8 ms    11 ms     8 ms  10.80.192.1
  3     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  24.200.227.94
  4    10 ms     9 ms     9 ms  24.200.227.97
  5    11 ms    11 ms    10 ms  216.113.122.17
  6    30 ms    28 ms    27 ms  216.113.122.78
  7   120 ms   121 ms   120 ms  cr2-tengig-0-7-0-0.londonuk1.savvis.net [204.70.
195.138]
  8   124 ms   126 ms   126 ms  msr1-tengig0-3-0-0.uk1.savvis.net [204.70.195.13
4]
  9   122 ms   120 ms   120 ms  204.70.203.126
10   135 ms   126 ms   130 ms  206.24.169.254
11   127 ms   128 ms   135 ms  ldn-s2-rou-1021.UK.eurorings.net [134.222.230.13
]
12   129 ms   133 ms   131 ms  obl-rou-1021.NL.eurorings.net [134.222.231.173]

13   131 ms   131 ms   133 ms  134.222.224.26
14   129 ms   132 ms   131 ms  134.222.97.18
15   132 ms   131 ms   135 ms  0.ae2.xr4.d12.xs4all.net [194.109.5.82]
16   132 ms   129 ms   132 ms  te5-4.swcolo2.1d12.xs4all.net [194.109.12.6]
17   132 ms   131 ms   129 ms  games05.xs4all.nl [194.109.69.205]

Trace complete.

with a ping of 132 I shouldnt be "freezing" and barley able to walk, again I will say that this is more lag than the norm

[imported_Hate]

yank i live in canada

Code:

Pinging games05.xs4all.nl [194.109.69.205] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=109
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=109
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=109
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=109

Ping statistics for 194.109.69.205:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 131ms, Maximum = 133ms, Average = 132ms

Here's the tracert

Code:

Tracing route to games05.xs4all.nl [194.109.69.205]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.2.1
  2     8 ms    11 ms     8 ms  10.80.192.1
  3     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  24.200.227.94
  4    10 ms     9 ms     9 ms  24.200.227.97
  5    11 ms    11 ms    10 ms  216.113.122.17
  6    30 ms    28 ms    27 ms  216.113.122.78
  7   120 ms   121 ms   120 ms  cr2-tengig-0-7-0-0.londonuk1.savvis.net [204.70.
195.138]
  8   124 ms   126 ms   126 ms  msr1-tengig0-3-0-0.uk1.savvis.net [204.70.195.13
4]
  9   122 ms   120 ms   120 ms  204.70.203.126
10   135 ms   126 ms   130 ms  206.24.169.254
11   127 ms   128 ms   135 ms  ldn-s2-rou-1021.UK.eurorings.net [134.222.230.13
]
12   129 ms   133 ms   131 ms  obl-rou-1021.NL.eurorings.net [134.222.231.173]

13   131 ms   131 ms   133 ms  134.222.224.26
14   129 ms   132 ms   131 ms  134.222.97.18
15   132 ms   131 ms   135 ms  0.ae2.xr4.d12.xs4all.net [194.109.5.82]
16   132 ms   129 ms   132 ms  te5-4.swcolo2.1d12.xs4all.net [194.109.12.6]
17   132 ms   131 ms   129 ms  games05.xs4all.nl [194.109.69.205]

Trace complete.

with a ping of 132 I shouldnt be "freezing" and barley able to walk, again I will say that this is more lag than the norm

You should be able to play fine with 130ms, but it's not the server hardware that is causing it, it is most likely your computer. The ping itself is low enough not to cause lag. If the server hardware would be causing it then everybody would lag the way you do. I have 130ms as well, and I can play fine without much lag at all, even tho I do prefer the days when I had 30ms by far ;p

Do you have a lot of packetloss? It does not say anything about packetloss in your ping-attempt, but on the other hand you may just have been lucky at that time. Ping for longer by typing "ping inx.xs4all.nl -t" and watch a long ping and see if you get timeouts, then post it here again.

My suggestion for what you should do to figure out what is causing it:

1. First off let some friend of yours bring his computer to your place and play through your connection. If he also has 130ms and lags then it's the connection, but he should not have that, and then you can be pretty sure that it is your computer causing the lag.
   
   
2. If he did not lag and you're starting to believe that it is your computer doing it then bring the computer to your friends house and try it there. If you lag there but not him then you can be certain that it is your computer doing it, however you can be 99% certain of it just after your friend testing his computer at your house.
   

Why do I not think it is the server hardware or your connection?

Answer:
Because if it would be the connection or the server hardware then you should either get packetloss or have A LOT worse ping than 130, with 130ms and no packetloss it should not be the connection nor the server hardware causing it.

Regards,
Hate

[imported_LudaKrishna]

it's not my laptop, as this is used for many other games/programming.

1.6GHz (Core 2 Duo, 2 CPU's)
1GB RAM
80GB Hard Drive (approx 40% free space)

again after talking to gandalf i'm just pointing out that this is more than the norm that we usually get and thought ppl should know about it

[imported_Andrew]

Pinging games05.xs4all.nl [194.109.69.205] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=122
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=122
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=122
Reply from 194.109.69.205: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 194.109.69.205:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 58ms, Average = 52ms


Can live with that

[Eighty Swords]

LOL theres actually no reason then why you sold it for cheaper even if hes nicer because your would of made a profit you're just retarded then hahahahah

even sandra offered more then him you're just a ridiculous suck up

And you go look over my thread. When I said I got an offer for over 400k, nobody posted a new offer. By the time I sold it if Sandra offered more then 400k not much I can do about it. Anyways, that's not even what this thread is about, so lets just drop it. Agreed?

1.6GHz (Core 2 Duo, 2 CPU's)
1GB RAM
80GB Hard Drive (approx 40% free space)

I know UO is a very old game but that's not exactly a very powerful laptop. I imagine you're running UO + msn + a web browser + (obviously) windows + a media player + tons of background services, etc. All of that adds. Not much of that uses the web but it still takes away from your system.


Recently I changed (for some things) from Razor to Injection and for the first time in all the years I spent on UO I ran smoothly! I couldn't believe it.

Who knows, maybe there is lag, maybe it's videotron, maybe it's the transatlantic lines that are under a higher load in more recent months compared to years ago. Too many variables.

[smoke]

And you go look over my thread. When I said I got an offer for over 400k, nobody posted a new offer. By the time I sold it if Sandra offered more then 400k not much I can do about it. Anyways, that's not even what this thread is about, so lets just drop it. Agreed?




I know UO is a very old game but that's not exactly a very powerful laptop. I imagine you're running UO + msn + a web browser + (obviously) windows + a media player + tons of background services, etc. All of that adds. Not much of that uses the web but it still takes away from your system.


Recently I changed (for some things) from Razor to Injection and for the first time in all the years I spent on UO I ran smoothly! I couldn't believe it.

Who knows, maybe there is lag, maybe it's videotron, maybe it's the transatlantic lines that are under a higher load in more recent months compared to years ago. Too many variables.

uo is a 15 year old game i could run it on my old p1 hes got a 3.4 ghz and a gig of ram and tons of space it's not the reason why hes lagging and it's not just him i am too and many others also like monkey and shade as he posted so that rules out that question