11-03-2011, 03:04 AM
Dear IN Staff,
I have come with some concerns about the 1 account per ip situation. I understand that the staff would like to control how many accounts are made out there and I totally understand that. Thing I'm worried about is I do have friends that play or have played on IN1 and 1 currently has had interest now. Not as much as me but I was wondering about something. I do go to his house on the regular, and sometimes we play co-op over a router with computer games. I'm some what reluctant to play UO now over at his house in case i ever wanted to hang out and chill , and crash at his house for the night. I was planning on doing that but with recent ip watching I don't want to get banned if i log on to my account from his place since he has created a account here as well. I'd hate to be penalized and not be able to log on because he's made an account. So my suggestion is that I understand that if we have relatives we could just let staff know that they want to play and they can make the arrangements on same ip. Is it also ok to have at least "one real life" friend that we can add instead of a relative just in case we go over to there house stay the night and if we have a urge to play or macro on UO we could do that without fear of being banned? I would just leave it up and macro at home but theirs risk factors in that, could be a fire hazard, could have parents that wouldn't allow to leave things on in your room if you were to leave for example. Just many things that could be in place that could prevent someone from doing that. I just wanted to request this so that it can give better insight on who is logging in on who's account and a little more leeway on people wanting to hang out as well as play with friends. I don't want this to seem like a avenue for people to exploit and that's not my intention at all and even if the limit was just 1 real life friend it could help make playing up with friends a little more exciting. I have to admit that i did do this back in IN1 days when i was macroing afk while playing games on PS2 at my friends house. I totally understand if that's not doable but just thought i'd ask anyway. thanks for reading and possibly considering.
I have come with some concerns about the 1 account per ip situation. I understand that the staff would like to control how many accounts are made out there and I totally understand that. Thing I'm worried about is I do have friends that play or have played on IN1 and 1 currently has had interest now. Not as much as me but I was wondering about something. I do go to his house on the regular, and sometimes we play co-op over a router with computer games. I'm some what reluctant to play UO now over at his house in case i ever wanted to hang out and chill , and crash at his house for the night. I was planning on doing that but with recent ip watching I don't want to get banned if i log on to my account from his place since he has created a account here as well. I'd hate to be penalized and not be able to log on because he's made an account. So my suggestion is that I understand that if we have relatives we could just let staff know that they want to play and they can make the arrangements on same ip. Is it also ok to have at least "one real life" friend that we can add instead of a relative just in case we go over to there house stay the night and if we have a urge to play or macro on UO we could do that without fear of being banned? I would just leave it up and macro at home but theirs risk factors in that, could be a fire hazard, could have parents that wouldn't allow to leave things on in your room if you were to leave for example. Just many things that could be in place that could prevent someone from doing that. I just wanted to request this so that it can give better insight on who is logging in on who's account and a little more leeway on people wanting to hang out as well as play with friends. I don't want this to seem like a avenue for people to exploit and that's not my intention at all and even if the limit was just 1 real life friend it could help make playing up with friends a little more exciting. I have to admit that i did do this back in IN1 days when i was macroing afk while playing games on PS2 at my friends house. I totally understand if that's not doable but just thought i'd ask anyway. thanks for reading and possibly considering.
i hate to see people leave i know dalzhim will quit afther this.... and for me its the same if i see my friends quit ill quit too and than my friends will quit and than there friends... if i want to login on proximus or my friend ringos acc to borrow some stuff or train there char because they are lazy why should i first ask premission? and wait till a gm comes online and ask them if its oke... i wish Dalzhim would stay this guy helped me sooo fuc king much with uo ... when iwas a noob he was there he gave us a house stuff gold rides.... he is for me one of the top players here!! everyone from in1 know's him so because of that please let Renald and Dalzhim keep there acc for the good intention...!
. I think just as long people let you know whats going on and not using it as an excuse to just gain on one solo account and the other being a mule (transfering good to one account) i think it would be ok. I think it seem pretty obvious tho if one person was just using one account as a mule(no fight skills, no interested in hunting in noobie dungeon, always afk on gathering skills, no social representation to the community and a history of transferring good that they farm to another account even without payment or whatever) but I can see that all that research would be very time consuming it just my opinion tho. Having more innovative ways to prevent this would be a +