Shade Wrote:This is a pro. Too many people just keep their things banked for ever and this would add a much needed risk, granted it wouldn't be much of a risk but risk is truly needed. Players are too babied here and this is proof of it.
You'll notice I said that's part of the game. I never said this is a bad thing, I said it's not fun when they could have just as easily bought regs from a stone that's been there for so long and is suddenly public enemy number one.
Shade Wrote:OMGZ! you mean like how people used to play UO?!?! Thats ridiculous!!! You know what, lets add scroll stones and pot stones too so this doesn't ever happen!
What about a stone that spams "overly sarcastic people can kiss my ass?" on everyone's screen when someone double clicks it? A reg stone doesn't make skills useless, giving pot and scroll stones does kill the point of having inscription and alchemy. A reg stone doesn't take jobs away from lots of players, adding pot and scroll stones would.
Shade Wrote:to be fully prepared for a single duel that may last 10 minutes, you are talking about 280-340 stones. I don't know why anyone would ever carry anywhere near 500 of each reg on them lol. Dueling for a few minutes with 100 of each reg will leave you with 40-60 of each anyway. Normally people run out of pots or scrolls when at the duel stones and need to restock them more frequently. Granted I am just going by what I see people say when they are dueling there...
You're right, usually a duel does only last a few minutes. But for the times when you have a good duel going for longer, you will run out of supplies carrying only 100 on you. Granted, I'm just going by what some of the best pvpers on the shard and personal friends I've known nearly my whole life tell me.
Epistemology Wrote:Thats lame of you to say the vendor area won't work because people would abuse it. Like anything that gets implemented into a shard it would have to be regulated of course, but thats not my point about the vendor area. All I hear from the people that don't like this idea is in previous post how everything is carebear and this isnt a carebear shard, yet they need to have 4 reg stones in the dueling arena and they dont want to have to leave to go get regs for fear of losing items?
I'm not saying this is what I predict will happen or this is what I think will happen based on some random intuition, it's a fact given that it happened on this very shard the last time a vendor area was the way you said.
By the way, there are only 3 reg stones in the *present* duel arena, no bolt or arrow stones since not many people duel with bows and crossbows. And you should also notice that there's at least one arena you cant see them from, and one or two where you can barely see them. I'm sure it was more of an oversight by the person who made this area then it was intentional, none the less it rather defeats the point of having them if you cant use it when it's there to be used.
Epistemology Wrote:Bottom Line, reg stones do more harm then good. The only pro to a reg stone is so people never have to leave duel area? That seems like a pretty lame one. Fine, don't get rid of em jack up the price though.
I don't see them doing harm. They take money OUT of the server, instead of passing it from one player to another. You want the stones to act as a gold sink, well they act as more of a gold sink then when gold is being traded from one player to another. Do you see the people using duel stones complaining about them? No you don't. On the contrary, it's someone who says they're not new, but is new, but is maybe somewhere in between the two that is complaining about them.
I think some people agreed a while back they're ok with raising the price but don't like the idea of getting rid of them.
Quote:I'm not the only one that likes this idea Eighty.
I never said you were, but I am saying that those who use the duel stones regularly, like having them there and I don't see why some people are so persistent on taking them away from the players who use them. You don't see me saying to get rid of the forges in towns because I don't use them and people should have to make their own or buy them from one of the few players with the skills to make them since they're too convenient to be given to you to craft armor and weapons.
Epistemology Wrote:And to as me "hiding" behind a new name I never said I am some old school god of IN:X reincarnate in disguise to pick on you. I am a veteran player who has played lots of UO, been on several successful shards and several not successful and I am trying to help by mentioning things that I have noticed cripple other shards full of good people.
I never incited that you were an IN:X god. A few posts back I made a comment about how people new to IN:X try to change things. You replied that you're not new, so I concluded you are a player who has been here for some time but are using a secret character with a new forum name, as if hoping people won't be biased towards your suggestions based on them liking you or not. If you're not new to UO, but are new to IN:X, then you proved my earlier point exactly as I meant it to be taken.
Epistemology Wrote:Picking on you Eighty? The thing that ticked me off was when you said "Pfft I'm glad your the one gonna be going around wasting your time buying regs and selling em" As if I am some retarded child trying to eat ice cream with a fork.
First, I never said you're a retard but if that's how you want to think about yourself, then by all means go ahead and do so. Second, I never said you picked on me I said you swear and call people names when things don't go your way.
Epistemology Wrote:And just because your posts are really long doesn't mean you got any kind of a point across.
Haha you misunderstood what I wrote that for. People say I write ridiculously wrong posts a lot of the time so I put that in there just for them. I didn't put it there to say look at me, I can write a long post so I must be right.
Now if you failed to see a single point that I raised in my post, (whether you agree with them or not), I'm still communicating a point, none of which you addressed, rather you defered to personal attacks and defenses. You're still not helping me or other people who are against this idea agree with you.
Epistemology Wrote:Who the **** did I call names? All I do is start discussions I then get hit up with stuff like "Idiot" "INXERR!?!" "Loser" all kinds of shit. If your refering to something where I made fun of smoke, look at all my posts in the past 3 weeks, he is there talking shit, its kind of our thing.
It's not a serious insult and I laughed when I saw it more then I got insulted, but you said "your a tar-tar", and throughout this thread, and in particular in some responses to me when I made no offensive statements, you replied with expletives.