02-15-2010, 06:40 PM
LudaKrishna Wrote:also 80 statics won't decay period so u could own 5 houses and never use ur static and never worry about it decaying.
I realize that, and that's why I suggested a 1 static per player limit. Let's say you don't own a static but you own 3 houses. The third one will decay on you after not visiting it in x number of days. If you do own a static though, and you're only allowed 1 plus any number of regular houses, the static will be like 1 of the 2 houses that won't decay on people who don't own any statics.
Watchout though luda, next someone is gonna suggest you pay a property tax for having your house out in the world because they want your house spot! lol
Kamos Wrote:I think this suggestion is addressing different issue. This wouldn't in any way address issue of longtime inactive players owning a static and it not being used for anything. I wouldn't really care how many statics people own as long as they are actually used by somebody. These "waste of space" statics are my only concern. Unused houses got (somewhat) addressed by implementing decay, statics did not)
No, it wouldn't address the issue of longtime inactive players, but it would prevent people from owning a bunch of statics that they don't use. If you really feel the need to own more then 1 house, buy your 1 nice static then make regular houses for whatever else you need them for.
What it does do is make it more fair for those who own 1 static and actually use it.
The same way as house decay won't free up tons of space since your first 2 houses can't decay. It will however stop people from clogging up an area for nothing.
