03-07-2009, 11:37 PM
Solid[PT];46235 Wrote:well, it isnt fair to both sides. A rich player would be harmed, but a poor player would be too. Why a poor player couldnt buy a humble room?
In the other side, it could be a market target, a rich player would buy the static and rent it to others.
that justification, Jirayia, isnt fair for both sides. a rich player hasnt more rights i think. I would like to buy a humble static room, why not?
Nothing at all stopping a poor player from buying ANY of the small 1 room static houses all over most towns. So what exactly is your point?
And no, a rich player doesnt have more rights then a poor player. They do however have more purchasing power. Gold is the currency to trade for resources, the more of it you have the more you can get. I guess when you go in to buy reagents with 12 gold, they just give you 10k of each eh? Blacksmiths selling you 200k igs for 500g? I'm just baffled by your logic.
I dont mean to be rude, but the whole point of having statics put up for auction is that the person prepared to spend the most money gets it. I mean what you two are talking about is like the UO equivilent of welfare. Rich players and poor players are both players, one has worked hard and made money, and one hasn't. Why should someone who's worked for their 2m cash to buy a nice static be denied because some guy wants to pay 30k for a safe macro room in guard zone in a big house? Want a static? Save up the cash and buy it like everyone else has done. There are a TON of small one room statics all across the map, find one you like and buy it. You two are way over-complicating things with this trying to sell off small portions of buildings.
That being said, making the inn rooms rentable doesnt sound like a bad idea. But this whole discussion is really pretty pointless. I had a 1 room shack for like 2.5 months, how many times did I get pk'd there while macroing? *drumroll........... ZERO*