[imported_Smurtle]

Who the **** cares about how long he was macroing or hunting for. He gives how many casts he did. It doesnt matter if hes hunting or macroing. Results arnt going to differ from how often he gains on killing something rather than macroing because hes doing the amount of casts he posts anyway. I for one have the shittiest most inefficient macro known to man, I might not make GM magery in two weeks, but I'll still do it in the same amount of casts as the guy that had the best macro there is and did it in the week and a half.

And to his healing, he says he gets .1 per x amount of actions, do some simple math and you can find out how many bandages he used. His other skills don't give gain per action, so therefore you can deduce that he actually did it correctly. Unless hes saying he gets x amount of healing per magic arrow cast he does, then hes just a total nimwit and then I'll agree with you.

This is what happens when you give idiots an outlet.

I don't give one flying circus **** what his numbers are or what amount he uses. I told you, he is macroing differently than I am. He hunts, I don't need to. I can macro it straight out until it is done which of course I'm going to be done before him. He just wanted to pull out his **** and flail it about a bit to feel he like he had something to prove because he doesn't like me. Maybe vice versa too, mostly because I like being an ass, but usually I don't make the mistake in being wrong- and he hasn't been wrong, necessarily, but when assuming my post was useless- wrong. That I didn't use the word "gain"- wrong. See, when you act word for word, I'm going to call you, word for word.

If you actually want to sit and count the casts, or precount them based on how many reagents you have, DO it! Anyone who has that droll of a life can keep it to themselves.