06-30-2007, 12:52 PM
The reason to why I do not know how to do that is cause I've never tried, the reason to why I've never tried is cause I would never want to do it
Non the less, I think it looked cool^^
I'm keeping busy with my web site right now, coding "compression" algorithms for it. So far I'm able to "compress" 50-90% of the code the user receives, without any downsides(it doesn't take CPU and the client side rendering is extremely fast). There is less code to process, less code to send and less code to gzip (saving ram and CPU). That result is a lot faster page loads (especially for modem users) and a lot less stain on the web server
Now that's both fun and challenging;p
Non the less, I think it looked cool^^
I'm keeping busy with my web site right now, coding "compression" algorithms for it. So far I'm able to "compress" 50-90% of the code the user receives, without any downsides(it doesn't take CPU and the client side rendering is extremely fast). There is less code to process, less code to send and less code to gzip (saving ram and CPU). That result is a lot faster page loads (especially for modem users) and a lot less stain on the web server
Now that's both fun and challenging;p